question:
i am debating between fut and fue techniques for hair transplant. i am fairly young and hair loss is not too extensive at this point. with what i can gather, this means i am more likely to need an additional procedure in the future. when you have a second procedure does this mean you also have an additional scar? this might help make the decision between the two techniques.
answer:
personally, if you can do an fut technique, it certainly is to your advantage for the reason that fut techniques get a better take of hair and an overall better result. the fue is a good technique for people who are planning on having very short hair or people who have obvious scar problems like keloids and hypertrophic scar formation. however, there is a less high percentage of hair take in the transplanted area from that and there is some loss of the follicles in the process of removing the fue grafts. if you are going to have a second procedure, the fact that that you had fut is not a problem because most of the new hair removed is done through the old original scar. you do not have to have a second scar, the new one can be placed over the first one and you still look excellent. as long as you keep your hair over about three-quarters of an inch in length, there should be no problem hiding this.美国的fut价格是4-6没有，fue价格是8--10美元，本人现在美国纽约，我的头发已经是3级a了。现在正在安排面谈看要植多少头发，在google上找了在网站上有推荐的，发现国外对这个东西很透明，哪个医生好，哪个机构好，都可以查的到的，还有论坛内一直吹嘘的sht技术，人家美国都很少机构做这个的，感觉fut和fue做的效果都是一样的，只是fut对于面积比较大，脱发比较深的，是比较好的，而fue一次提取的不是很多，严重的脱发要分2次做才有很好的效果，所以介意各位发友要式自己的情况而定。不要盲目的跟风。。。虽然国外的价钱比较贵，可能是美国的人工的费用很贵，而中国的人工比较便宜，但我宁可在纽约做，国内的都没有一个像样的关于植发交流的政府官方的交流组织 |
发表于 2010-9-4 13:50:16
植发想省钱加微信：15311067948
